"...are you experienced?"
San Francisco's Premiere Comic Book Shop

Choose from the pulldown menu:

If you've come to this page from a link outside our pages,
or if you've never read our intro to the Savage Critic,
please do so here. (It'll help prepare you!)

The Savage Critic: October 30th 2002
By Brian Hibbs and Jeff Lester

Welcome back, my friends, to the show that never ends. Bri let me write the intro for this week, which is really funny because I have to be at work at CE in seven minutes, and can't think of a damn thing to say. Normally, I might be a little more efficacious, but today is the first day of Nanowrimo, where participants write a crappy 50,000 word novel during the thirty days of November (it has to be a crappy novel because usually you need thirty-one days to write a good one). So I'm up on my wordcount for the day (at least 1,667 words a day if you want to keep up) but behind on thinking of stuff to say 'bout funny books. I will also admit, if pressed, to being in a slightly grumbly mood reviewing all this stuff this week because I really wanted to be doing drive-bys on a moped while listening to A Flock of Seagulls. Yeah, Grand Theft Auto: Vice City is out, and I'm loving it almost as much as I loved GTA3. But don't worry, I didn't let it get in the way of issuing my usual mouthy arbitrary reviews (yeah, I bumped a book's grade up just because I liked how the artist drew Hawkman, what's wrong with that?) over books that hardworking men and women sweated over...because that's the kind of guy I am.

Anyway, as usual, my comments are this color, and Hibbs' are in blue. So let's get busy!

100 BULLETS #39: The first thing I thought when I read this issue was “Hey, wasn’t the premise of this title that person after person got the box of 100 untracable bullets, a gun, and promise of complete immunity?” Whatever happened to that comic? I kinda liked that idea. I don’t think I’ve read one of those in like a year.... Anyway, this issue was pretty, but sorta empty. There aren’t protagonists I care about anywhere here, and I’m really starting to wonder just why I keep reading this – after 39 issues they’ve abandoned the central premise, while at the same time not really giving me enough to embrace with the Minutemen stuff, and have only introduced one character (Dizzy) who I care about in the SLIGHTEST. But then, I LOOK at the comic again, and say, “Goddamn, that’s some fine ass art” Anyway, Hibbs say Eh.  So you’re coming around to how I feel, is what you’re saying?  Actually, Risso’s top-notch storytelling made this one for me, where for the first time in a while, the stuff in the background just didn’t feel like Risso’s noddling around to keep things moving:  it actually served the story directly for a change.  However, although not as baggy as other issues I’ve read, the characters were, unfortunately, ciphers to me, rendering the ending merely effective (love that inverted image in the last panel!) rather than devastating.  Good.

3 LITTLE KITTENS #2:  Jim Balent is marketing it as an “all age action/adventure comic.”  Jim, do you really think six-year olds should read a book where the first four pages are women getting dressed and explaining how the villainess is motivated out of boob envy (yeah, the flashback panel of her fondling another woman’s breasts seems pretty all ages — if you learned to read with Playboy magazine).  But I think the scariest thing about this book is that Balent’s doing it because he finds his other book, Tarot, to be too intellectually taxing for him.  It’s not much worse than Balent’s other work, but his trying to pretend this can be sold alongside Archie is irresponsible almost to the point of criminality.  Oh, and it’s not “marshal arts,” it’s “martial arts.”  Christ.  Crap.  Hurrah for the joy and splendor that is Diamond alphabeticalism – “100” comes before “3” and “30”. I was terrified – TERRIFIED – by the “breast envy” origin of the antagonist. I very nearly threw the book across the room. But then I decided to go through and see how many panels I thought were swiped from porno mags. I counted three. I suspect that Balent things this book is “empowering” or something, and based upon the letters and fan art and pictures of other chicks in cat costumes, I guess some of his audience thinks so too. All I can say is that, in my not even slightly humble opinion, anyone who thinks that is basically fucked in the head. There are too many damaged people in this world, damn it. Total Crap

30 DAYS OF NIGHT #3: Hrh.  Y’know, I really loved the first issue. LOVED it. Which is nearly enough to make me HATE this conclusion. It smacked of “Oh, I only have 18 pages left to wrap this all up?”, while AT THE SAME TIME, padding out that ending way past the point of coherence. It’s a real shame: this could have been the best action/adventure horror comic of the year, and it ended up being total gobblegook. That first issue should probably be nominated for some award or another, but for the “I shall become a vampire to fight the vampires” ending, it doesn’t deserve to actually WIN. Awful.  Yup.  Feels to me like they squandered this.  Awful.

ACTION COMICS #796:  Okay, Brian got the “Lex knows” reboot he was hoping for, the Superteam figure out yet again how to have their cake (Superman kills!) and eat it too, and for at least the second time this year, a writer thinks that nobody’s read The Killing Joke but him.  And still none of it matters because the storyline relied too heavily on characters acting how they wouldn’t, and events happening for no other reason than they have to.  I’m giving it an Eh, just because it was a ten-car pile-up rather than the expected thirty. I’m giving it an Awful rather than the Crap I’m itching to for exactly the reason you cite, but I really fucking hated this whole arc, and every bit of the conclusion was just TOO pat and too easy. The Super-books are maybe a month away from being consigned to the “we don’t read this” pile because they’ve completely lost their way and are covered in accretions of pointless, uninteresting nonsense.

AGENT X #4: While I like the idea of the girl no one can see, it can’t possibly compare to the way Alan Moore handled the idea in The Ballad of Halo Jones.  Not that I’m expecting Gail to be Alan Moore or anything, but it’s immediately what I flashed on when she first opened her mouth. And, see, she was the most interesting character in this issue. I don’t find any of the leads to be likable or compelling. I mean, at least with Deadpool, I understood he was Daffy Duck. I could MAKE the previous iteration work, if I closed my eyes and concentrated. Not so here. Eh.  Actually, this is the kind of issue I liked.  Apart from, again, a bit of storytelling spoiling a joke (the final gag at the House of Skaba Putra), this had laughs and characterization and action.  I’m really gonna miss Gail Simone on this book when she leaves, although it’s probably not long for the world anyway. Good.

APACHE SKIES #4:  Hibbs should be writing the lead on this, because he liked the first miniseries and all.  Me?  I thought it was okay, but I didn’t really care.  There just wasn’t enough there there — nine times out of ten, you give somebody a Western and they’re doing shoot-outs and train chases and evil bastards with derringers up their sleeve, and they forget to put any people there.  It’s just the honorable renegade, and the coldly vengeful widow and the evil bastard, still with his derringer up his sleeve.  Pretty art, though, in a paperback cover kind of way. OK.  Yah, but it’s still really the only original western being published right now. I was pointed to a very interesting essay by Kim Thompson of Fantagraphics (http://www.tcj.com/3_online/e_thompson_071499.html) where he opines that the market really needs more good “crap” genre material. To excerpt one paragraph:

What's interesting about French crap is that it's all technically pretty good, and works within the trappings of genre fiction that would be accessible to the average reader. It's the equivalent of the kind of fat paperbacks you can buy at the airport.

Anyway, I think Apache Skies fits this definition superbly, and so I give it the special rank of Very Good “Crap”

AVENGERS #59: Did I forget an issue? Didn’t the Avengers just “take control of the world” or something? That wasn’t resolved, was it? So why isn’t it particularly addressed here? This was a disjointed read: a collection of scenes that didn’t really work together, or add up to any kind of a whole whatsoever. You can do soap opera drama in Avengers – in fact, I think the book demands it – but it has to be happening around and between the action. And there really wasn’t much “action” contained here. I LIKED some of the scenes – particularly the Doom scene – but I didn’t feel like it was nearly as focused or followed through as it should have been. Avengers really should be living dead-center in the Marvel Universe. It needs to be the book that pays attention to and reacts against current continuity, while furthering the soap opera of all of the minor characters that we like, but who can’t support their own books. Which this run is doing very badly. So... Awful Actually, the parts that I liked were the Marvel Universe parts that didn’t fit in with Johns’ own storyline:  Scorpio whisks away the world’s capitals because everyone was worshipping false leaders, but he leaves behind Dr. Doom, a tyrant (and while I’m at it, Black Panther, a king, or Sub-Mariner, another king)?   I’m glad Johns is giving props to Christopher Priest’s handling of Black Panther, but the logic of the storyline suffers for it.  Better than last issue, though.  Eh.

BATMAN DEATHBLOW AFTER THE FIRE #3:  I read neither parts one nor two — the art looked pretty but I presumed that Azzarello would just be walking through on this one.  But this issue, at least, seemed strong; there were only a few instances where his characteristic banter got out of hand.  Most of the time it seemed a complex piece of work that sewed the past and present together quite well.  I’ll have to check out parts 1 and 2, now.  Good. Huh. Well, I thought it was fine, I guess, but the super-long wait between issues definitely cut any real interest I might have had. I did kind of like that it was LITERALLY Batman/Deathblow, but I thought it was telegraphed, and not at all a surprise for the reader. Eh. Oh, and Jeff? Issue #1 is OOP from DC.  Arghh!

BATMAN FAMILY THE TRACKER #1: ...the fuck? What the hell is this? A weekly mini-series? What the fuck for? Batman sure doesn’t need any line extensions. Not even really any “family” here – Brucie is off on his lonesome, per usual. Introduces both a new “organization” to haunt Gotham (been there, done that... and it all seems so improbable – how can someone move that kind of money and equipment into the city and NOT have Oracle and Batman know?), as well as a doomed before it starts subplot of evil people trying to gain control of Wayne Enterprises. No, I disbelieve! If this had any chance of being an ACTUAL threat, it’d happen in the main books. This kinda shit really pisses me off, and I think my extremely anemic and mediocre order is going to end up being too high by half. Fuckers. Crap.   Heh, heh. That's precisely what I thought when this book was announced. But I’ll be honest:  even though I wasn’t too crazy about the art, or the opener, and I thought too little was revealed considered how high the pagecount, it’s nice to get some new villains introduced, even if one of them looks like little more than a cherry-red Predator.  Could’ve been worse, I thought so I’m giving it an OK.

BATMAN GOTHAM ADVENTURES #55:  The other week, I was griping about Burchett’s work on Detective Comics #775 because of the body language.  Here, though, it works like a charm with the more simply rendered figures and really allows you to focus on the knockout storytelling.  I think the story might be too complex for the intended audience (which is a gentle way of saying it was almost too complex for me) but the intelligence of it and the storytelling were great.  Very good. I really agree with everything you just said – wonderful art by a wholly underlooked artist, and a story nearly out of place for it’s audience. See, I even just restated it to make it appear as if I’m actually adding something to the conversation!  Very Good

CODENAME KNOCKOUT #18: Well, it’s got catfights and panty shots and bare breasts, at least. Still thought it was Awful, though.  Also, this seems more like a spoof of soap operas than spy series, what with the evil twin angle and all the family stuff.  Too competent to be horrid, but incredibly dull, dull, dull. Awful.

FIGHT FOR TOMORROW #2:  More pieces of this fell into place, and the art’s strong and atmospheric, but something’s still not clicking with me:  Wood seems to take have growth in character dynamics happen off-page (all of a sudden Cedric is acting like a close friend to Shu Lien, saying things like “I would never let anything happen to him while he was with me, Shu Lien.  You know that,” when the rest of the first two issues he’s been a bloodied, self-absorbed wreck that barely acknowledged her.  Good art and the benefit of the doubt makes me give this an OK, but I’m dubious. I bet it’ll read better in a TP. Though, with those kinds of sales figures, a TP is probably not quickly coming. Me, I can recommend anything Denys Cowan draws, so that saves it from less than an OK

FLASH #191: Very very pretty art, wrapped around an oh-so-painfully weak story. Really, it wasn’t even a story, just an excuse to put Wally and Katar together. Which is fine with me, really, but I sorta think Wally doesn’t need to be told that Barry would be proud of him after all of this time – especially with Johns’ plots of late. Plus, and I know they’ve been gone forever, but I really do miss the “My name is Wally West. I’m the Fastest Man Alive” captions. Not sure why I’m bring it up 2 years later, but for this kind of self-contained story, Wally probably would have been a better narrative voice/choice. So, a marginal thumbs up with an OK.  Kolins draws Hawkman the way I like him drawn, with most of the face visible underneath the mask. so I arbitrarily bump this up to Good.

FORLORN FUNNIES #2:  Good strong work by Paul Hornschemeier.  I think the eight page prologue was a little long, but the narrative voice in both it and what follows was understated and strong, and the various formalist conceits helped keep everything rolling.  I’m very much looking forward to the next issue of this.  Very good. I agree, but to a lesser degree. I suspect once he’s go a TP’s amount of work and he can give it a minor edit, this will be seen as a major work, but I didn’t especially feel as though I got my money’s worth out of the issue presented. It’s a bit like how I feel about Jimmy Corrigan: I wasn’t able to really grok what Ware was doing until I had the whole thing in one package. This is my weakness as a consumer. And yes, I invoked Ware deliberately. Good

GOTHAM GIRLS #3: I liked how the art is almost Jay Stephenish in places here, and the House of Mirrors was a good gag, but other than that:  Eh. My big problem was it was “all middle” – basically the whole episode revolved around one Girl hitting another until the McGuffin passed to a third. Lather. Rinse. Repeat. Which is great for padding, but not all that exciting for a $2.25 cost. I am prepared to be dazzled, but honest to god I’m going to guess there was 3 issues worth of content in this 5-issue mini. Eh

HELLBLAZER #177: Well, Eh. I adore Carey’s Lucifer, but I’m totally unexcited about his JC. Really, more than anything, this made me think of the Mobfire mini-series. Which wasn’t all that good either.  God, but Marcelo Frusin’s another one, for me.  I’ll buy the book just for his art.  And I like that Carey’s making JC’s magic use be a little less vague than in previous issues.  I’m not dying of excitement, but I want to read the next issue, which is saying something.  Good.

I HATE CARTOONS #2:  Attaboy, the few times I’ve met him, seems to be a helluva nice guy, but this second volume of his anthology is both tremendously accomplished and kinda underwhelming.  On the one hand, this book is kinda like the comic book section of Nickelodeon Magazine, but for grown-ups, and features some very funny material, and work by Mark Martin, who I always consider a luminary. On the other hand, I never like anthologies if I feel the work is just stuff the cartoonists scraped together from previous work and mailed it off in an envelope—there are so many single-page strips with logos at the top, the book almost feels like a pitch book for the comix section of indy newspapers.  And yet I’d also say a lot of the strip stuff (like Mark Martin’s Fish or William Bredbeck’s Meow) was funnier and more accomplished than some of the longer free-form stuff.  I love that this book has copious color throughout, and the quality of the binding, printing and all that is great, but it’s hard to recommend the scattershot quality of the work when it comes with a $5.95 price tag.  If this was $2.95, it’d definitely get a good, but at this price I gotta give it an Eh. Yeah, I’m more or less with you – you picked the exact two works that I thought wildly succeeded, as well. On the other hand, it’s Hi-quality, and lots of color, and even the worst thing in the book isn’t total shit (though some steer a little close) – I’d call this a $4.95 package myself, but I might be biased, because Mark Martin is god-damn cool, and, really, this is the only place we get him. OK

PARADIGM #2: I dunno. I want to like this. There’s places, even whole pages at a time, where I like this, but then there’s whole stretches where I think it’s just an enormous damn wankfest. The storytelling veers wildly from stellar to barely competent. So, I dunno. OK, I think, because it looks like they ARE learning their craft (as we pay), but, damn it, this screams desperately for the hand of an editor).  Yup, just what I would’ve said.  The first four pages are tight, smooth and enthralling, then it just goes all over the place from there.  It just kills me because a good editor would help them hone all this passion and talent much more quickly.  OK.

PARADISE X #6:  Well, even if you’re an old-school Marvel Fanboy like myself, you gotta spend some time (more and more each issue, it seems) getting annoyed with what I call Cottage Industry X, because the format Ross & Co. have in place allows for some major-league vamping, which not even the creators care about in the slightest.  So a fight between the forces of the Negative Zone, the Guardians of the Galaxy and the super-powered street cops of new New York, which used to be the sort of thing comic book creators and fans took some relish in, is about as exciting as watching someone parallel park in the hands of the team here.  In a way, this really does remind me of Dante’s Divine Comedy, at least partly because the simple appeal of drama and action recedes for the creators as they get more and more absorbed by their loftier ideas.  Eh.  Ladies and Gentlemen: Jeff Lester, College Boy and Fanboy. What he said, except I’m no fanboy. Awful

POPBOT #3: I Looked, I Read, I Shrugged. Eh.  Yeah, it’s like: Ashley Wood is incredibly talented, but is he any good? Eh, at best.

PROMETHEA #23:  Okay, should have figured out Moore would wrap up the meaning of everything in issue #23, shouldn’t I?  This issue was pretty much the the ne plus ultra of cosmic storylines, and I both loved it tremendously and am kinda glad that maybe we can now move on to some more base stuff, like drama, and maybe even people smacking each other, maybe a Promethea-Promethea cat-fight, and like that.  Very Good.  Yeah, bring on the base stuff, I done feel edumicated enough. Very Good

PUNISHER #17: Punisher is a comedy book, really. A very dark and nasty one, but it’s all a big laugh. It took me quite a while to figure that out. But I think they played out the joke a bit too far this one, and this almost certainly should have been a one-parter. Eh. Yeah, it’s overplayed, but that tends to be the case at least half the time here.  But still, Ennis and Robertson are the dream team of evil, violent hijinks.   And once again, Ennis gives the concept of the super-hero team-up all the respect it deserves.  Good.

RESISTANCE #2:  Hibbs is gonna call me crazy, but I’m still quite liking this.  After two years of watching everyone crib slow-motion fight scenes and trenchcoats from The Matrix, it’s nice to see someone take hold of the gritty class war angle:  the double-page spread with the Thoreau quote made me feel all warm and fuzzy.  I’ve got a few minor things to be bitch about, but if you haven’t already, find a copy of #1 (because I don’t think issue #2 makes much sense on its own) and hop on.  Very good. Yah, you’re crazy. To me, this was I’ve-Taken-All-Of-The-Pop-Culture-I’ve-Consumed-Over-The-Last-3-Years-And-Sicked-It-Up-All-Over-The-Page. I can’t even get past the “Z” in the gang’s name. That’s Bob Haney stuff, daddio. Eh

RUBBER NECKER #2: I really like the NUB. He used to be my rep when he worked in the marketing department at DC, and I could always count on him. He is really growing as a cartoonist – both formally as well as in his storytelling chops – but I have to admit that I find his stories themselves to be unengaging to me. It’s almost... oh, shit, I dunno, as if he’s trying too hard? Can’t muster better than an Eh.  If this had been all Drop Ceiling, I would have loved it.  But the other stuff felt almost like filler in comparison.  Works off the old Eightball model of being an anthology book, but with only one creator.  Sadly, Bertozzi isn’t as funny as Clowes, so all the non-Drop Ceiling stuff feels like filler.  Eh, but with lots and lots of potential.

SAVAGE DRAGON #101:  I’m sorry, but the first thing that came to mind after reading this is “ Maybe this is really called ‘The Savage Drag On.’”  I was tired of this parallel worlds scenario twenty issues ago, and still Larsen is flailing in the stories’ self-generated red tape:  The “Real” Dragon isn’t the “same” Dragon and so is having difficulty reconciling with the woman he loves who isn’t the “Real” Woman he loves, etc., etc.  It’s like Larsen’s created his own personal Spider-Clone storyline and can’t let it go.  I respect the guy’s talent and passion, but this book now alternates between being weightless or senseless, and neither route is doing it for me.  Awful. Double-plus agreed. Awful.

SPIDER-MAN TANGLED WEB #19: I love Mahfood’s art, but this was an 6-page gag for Coober Skeeber II, padded out to 22 pages. Yah, “The Grizzly” is a lame villain. I got it already, man. Eh.  Hibbs nails it, and he doesn’t even bother with the whole Rhino thing, and the plot twists right out of an episode of Friends.  But Coober Skeeber II.  Yeah, that hits it right on the head.  Eh.

STAR WARS INFINITIES THE EMPIRE STRIKES BACK #3:  Somewhere, and I’m not exactly sure if it was this issue or last, this became just flat-out dull.  “Imaginary” stories work because of their willingness to shock, and go to places in-continuity stories can’t; otherwise they’re the fanboy equivalent of dully working out math equations.  Awful. True. And they completely bobble any possible emotional drama they could have wrung out of it with the Vader/C3PO scene. Still, I liked it slightly better than you because I was more bored than offended by it. Eh

SUPERMAN ALIENS II GODWAR #3: Mostly padding this one, wasn’t it? Blah blah, and blah some more. Eh.  Kevin Nowlan doing the inks on the Fourth World characters created by Kirby will get some love from me, but I feel like those characters are essentially incompatible to the creepy Gigerish pessimism of the Aliens-series, and vice versa.  Both concepts feel diminished as a result which is why this feels like filler.   Eh.

TITANS #46:  Back in my day, we used to call this a crap comic.  Blibbity-blab that isn’t even consistent with itself from one page to another, and dumb beyond all belief.  I’m presuming from the credits this was a leftover story that they tried to clean-up, but barely a page of it seemed competent.  If they can’t do better than this, they should just pull the plug now.  Bleah. It’s gotta be pulled soon – this is one of the $2.75 books. I assume it’ll go to #50, and then change or die. Peyer’s an odd writer – he clearly has neat ideas, but he doesn’t seem to be able to be able to execute them compellingly. There was good geek-use of the Titan’s dead, though. Eh

TOM STRONG #18: This is off track, I think. Boy’s Adventure shouldn’t really have punchlines about sex or swearing without actually using the words. Too many characters crammed through a story that I didn’t feel any peril from, as the conclusion of a multiparter that feels like it started a year ago. Sub-par Moore, and I say Eh. Well, the last page made me laugh, but I think it was too long between issues or something.  Because again, kinda like Paradise X, for an all-action issue creators used to sell their eyeteeth to set up, this felt very perfunctory.  Eh.

ULTIMATES #7:  I’m surprised.  I thought Millar was sowing seeds for future storylines with that whole Wasp/Ant-Man thing, not, um, the second storyline.  This felt like more set-up but, as is usually the case, the individual set-pieces (Cap with Bucky and his wife, Thor with Fury) make the whole thing a more than worthy read.  A very high good, as opposed to the usual very good.  Yah, Good here too. I’m sure this’ll read great in a TP, but it wasn’t the most satisfying single read. Ultimates might really be a prime example of “just wait for the trade”.

USAGI YOJIMBO #61: Charming as always, even the worst issue of Usagi is still great comics. Not that this is the worst. Jesus, I can’t even vamp properly. Very Good.  Heh, heh.  You crack me up, Hibbs.  But I agree: very good in a way that somehow doesn’t inspire much critical comment.  Why is that?

WILDCATS VERSION 3.0 #3:  I didn’t like this as much as the first two issues, although the art’s just as lovely to look at.  Some of the storytelling’s getting a little sloppy (why’d the chick not just bump off Grifter and Wax after threatening to kill them just a few panels earlier?).  And if there’s one Caseyism Joe should retire, it’s the geeky teen computer whiz who talks street.  Bringin’ him back just because he can swear now just isn’t a good enough reason.  Eh. Yah, strike one and two for me, too. This also felt pointless and a bit stretched out. Eh.

WOLVERINE #182: Bad counterpoint to this week’s Punisher. As a title, I don’t think Wolverine has ever had a direction that really works, and yet it’s made it 182 issues. That drives me bugfuck. Awful. See, what’s great about gangster stories is you can paint with really broad strokes. Which isn’t a bad way to do a Wolverine story, either.  But without a sense of, whattyacall it, nuance, you just got a bunch of clichés, which, if you don’t do ‘em better than everyone before you, just end up being tired clichés, to boot.  Crap.

For Sake of Completeness, here’s a list of all of the OTHER comics that CE got in this week, that I did NOT read (and, therefore, am unlikely to review!). Note, that in most cases this is limited to 1) Manga, which I try to read as it is collected; 2) “Kids” comics like most of the Archies; 3) titles that were subs-only, either by design or accident; 4) Porno [oh, like you need me to REVIEW it!], 5) Things that looked SO bad on the racks that I didn’t bother, and 6) stuff that I’ve assessed before, and I care so little about that I don’t want to waste my time reading anymore. You decide which is which.

ARCHEON #1 & #2 FLIPBOOK
ARCHIE DOUBLE DIGEST #138
BATTLE OF THE PLANETS #4
BATTLE POPE WRATH OF GOD #3
BETTY & VERONICA #181
BTVS #50
CALL OF DUTY THE BROTHERHOOD #5
DUNGEONS AND DRAGONS BLACK AND WHITE #4
GLOOM COOKIE #14
HOLLIDAY #2
HOLY TERROR #2
KEN LASHLEYS LEGENDS #1
KILLBOX PRIMER #1
MERIDIAN #29
MUTANT EARTH #3
OUT THERE #14
PATH #8
PRIVATE BEACH #6
RUNNERS #1 BAD GOODS
SONIC THE HEDGEHOG #116
TERRY MOORES PARADISE TOO #10
THUNDERCATS #3 
TIM VIGILS WEBWITCH VIGIL #2 
VAMPIRE YUI VOL 4 #7
VAMPIRELLA #13

And, for even MORE completeness sake, here’s a list of books, TPBs, GNs, magazines, and other things that CE got this week. I generally haven’t read any of this by the time I post these reviews. Though I generally attempt to give at least one recommendation amongst the TPBs each week, since I HAVE read the material at SOME point.

ALTER EGO #18
ASIAN CULT CINEMA #37
ASTRO BOY VOLUME 8 TP
BONE VOL 8 TREASURE HUNTERS HC
DEAD TO RIGHTS GN
DEADLINE TP
ESSENTIAL DAREDEVIL VOL 1 TP NEW PRTG
FUSHIGI YUGI VOL 7 CASTAWAY TP
FUTURAMA O RAMA VOL 1 TP
JLA THE ULTIMATE GUIDE HC
LITTLE GLOOMY VOL 1 TP
LONE WOLF & CUB VOL 26 BATTLEIN THE DARK TP
MOBILE SUIT GUNDAM 0079 VOL 7TP
PINK GN (A)
PREVIEWS VOL XII #11
STAR WARS INSIDER #63
SUPERPATRIOT LIBERTY & JUSTICE TP
VIDEO WATCHDOG #89
ZIPPY ANNUAL 2002

This Week’s TP recommendation is: Not a great list, really. In fact, it means it automatically falls to Lone Wolf & Cub V 23. Bone V8 is also great, but it’ll be coming in SC in just a few weeks. I, personally, would wait. Lame TP of the week: the Pink GN. Neat idea for a porno GN to be done in pink ink, but the color they chose rendered it completely unreadableYeah, give it up for LW&C!

Pick of the Week: You know what? I don’t have a single “Excellent”, and I read my list of “Very Good” thinking “what did I actually enjoy the most this week as a single reading experience, and I have to say that I have to give it to Usagi Yojimbo #61. It’s “just another” issue of Usagi, which means it’s great, and I probably haven’t highlighted this book enough. It’s really easy to overlook Sakai because he comes out rock solid on time, although he tells varied and relatively complex stories, and yet is utterly charming every time. I love this book, and you should too, so go give Stan some money Hey, right on, Hibbs.  For me it’s Forlorn Funnies #2.  Wasn’t pleased about the prologue sequence, but the rest of the book has haunted me.

Pick of the Weak: Can I say Avi Arad on 60 Minutes II this week? Talk about a weasel perfomance. 3 Little Kittens is the obvious choice, with it’s breast obsessed villainess, yes, but for pure cynical capitalism, I have to give it to the launch of Batman Family #1. This is not What We Need.  Nah, for me, it’s 3 Little Kittens #2, because Balent is either being willfully negligent or disastrously unconscious of his “all ages” approach.  It that was a Marvel book being marketed like that, we’d be hollering for somebody’s head on a stick.

 


  All Material on this page: © 2001-2005 by Comix Experience (except the graphic, which was appropriated from Tales of Suspense #21,
and is probably © Marvel Comics).  Reproduction without permission is expressly forbidden.